For military history enthusiasts, the debate often comes down to: Musée de l'Armée (Paris) vs. Imperial War Museum (London). Having visited both, here is the breakdown.
The Atmosphere
- Paris: It feels imperial. Housed in a 17th-century palace, it focuses on glory, uniforms, kings, and the "Art of War." It is grand and solemn.
- London: The IWM London is more modern and social-history focused. It focuses heavily on the "people's war" and the cost of conflict.
The Collections
- Paris Strength: Ancient Armor & Napoleon. The medieval and Renaissance sections in Paris are vastly superior. The sheer volume of armor and royal weaponry is unmatched. Also, having the actual tomb of Napoleon on-site adds a layer of reverence London can't match.
- London Strength: Since 1914. The IWM tells the story of WWI and WWII with more emphasis on the civilian experience, the Holocaust, and modern espionage. It feels more narrative-driven.
The Verdict
- Go to Paris if you love: Swords, knights, Napoleon, grand architecture, and the aesthetic beauty of weaponry.
- Go to London if you love: Personal letters, social impact, tanks, and a deep emotional dive into 20th-century conflict.
Ideally? You need to see both.